The Turn of “Roland Barthes and the Limits of Structuralism”: Grammar and Referential Function in Paul de Man
Main Article Content
Abstract
At the height of French semiology, Paul de Man tried to make a polemic with Roland Barthes. His text left unpublished, but it is still of great importance for the study of structuralism, and to read Paul de Man’s work. Indeed, De Man’s essay shows arguments against Roland Barthes which will be then topics of his further works. This essay aims to be a review about Paul de Man’s theoretical problems with Roland Barthes and how the development of these arguments shows the main influence of Kenneth Burke’s work on the Belgian critic.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This magazine is available in open access under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
References
Barthes, R. (1994). El estilo y su imagen. En El susurro del lenguaje. Más allá de la palabra y de la escritura (pp. 140-159). Barcelona: Paidós.
Burke, K. (1969a). A Grammar of Motives. Los Angeles: California University Press.
Burke, K. (1969b). A Rhetoric of Motives. Los Angeles: California University Press.
Bygrave, S. (1993). Kenneth Burke. Rhetoric and Ideology. New York: Routledge.
Crusius, T. W. (1986). A Case of Kenneth Burke’s Dialectic and Rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 19(1), 23-37.
De Man, P. (1990). Alegorías de la lectura. Lenguaje figurado en Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke y Proust. Barcelona: Lumen.
De Man, P. (2020). Roland Barthes y los límites del estructuralismo. En N. Avaro (Ed.), Barthes en cuestión (pp.43-74). Ñuñoa - Rosario: Bulk editores - Nube Negra.
Dosse, F. (1997). History of Structuralism. Volume 1: The Rising Sign, 1945 – 1966 (D. Glassman Trad.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dosse. F. (1998). History of Structuralism. Volume 2: The Sign Sets, 1967 - Present. 1966 (D. Glassman Trad.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Durham, W. B. (1980). Kenneth Burke’s Concept of Substance. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66(4), 351-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638009383534
Eyers, T. (2017). Speculative Formalism: Literature, Theory, and the Critical Present. Illinois: Northwestern University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv47w7b0
Garayalde, N. (2021). La retórica en cuestión. Badebec ,11(21), 53-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35305/b.v11i21.513
Jameson, F. R. (1978). The Symbolic Inference: Or Kenneth Burke and Ideological Analysis. Critical Inquiry, 4(3), 507-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/447950
Podlubne, J. (2020). Visión ciega. El Roland Barthes de Paul de Man. En N. Avaro (Ed.), Barthes en cuestión (pp.7-42). Ñuñoa - Rosario: Bulk editores - Nube Negra. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.cl23-47.prbs